Ethoxysclerol injection into the posterior ligament under single puncture arthroscopy for the treatment of recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation: a novel technique.

The pathogenesis of recurrent chronic dislocation of the temporomandibular joint has been attributed to multiple factors, such as hyperlaxity of the soft tissues or alterations in the size of the temporal eminence. When there are no bone alterations, the injection of sclerosing solutions is an effective treatment that can be performed using a blind technique or with arthroscopy. This study presents an innovative technique for injecting ethoxysclerol into the posterior ligament through single puncture arthroscopy. This approach offers a safe and effective alternative for surgeons without experience in high-complexity arthroscopy who want to ensure precise injection of the agent into the desired anatomical areas.

Author Correction: Meta-analyses of sulodexide and other drugs in prevention and treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome.

Correction to: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022; 26 (24): 9372-9381. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202212_30688-PMID: 36591846-published online on December 21, 2022. After publication, the authors found a typo in the discussion section. The sentence to amend is the following one: ·       In meta-analyses of observational studies, we found a low incidence of PTS, with 9% of patients presenting PTS among patients receiving sulodexide and a 50% reduction in the risk of PTS in patients receiving rivaroxaban. The "9%" in the sentence below should be changed to "15%" (in order to align the Discussion section with the Results section and the Abstract. There are amendments to this paper. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. https://www.europeanreview.org/article/30688.

Meta-analyses of sulodexide and other drugs in prevention and treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common chronic complication of deep vein thrombosis. Elastic compression (ECS) is the common pillar for PTS prevention and treatment, while the pharmacological approach for PTS includes direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and venoactive drugs (VADs) for prevention and treatment, respectively. Sulodexide can be used both in long-term prevention and in the treatment of PTS. To better understand the efficacy of the main drugs used in the prevention (sulodexide or DOACs) and treatment of PTS (sulodexide or VADs), pairwise meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs were conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for observational studies and RCTs was performed. Incidence of PTS, reduction in PTS signs or symptoms and proportion of patients with complete venous ulcers healing were the primary outcomes for prevention and treatment of PTS, respectively. Fixed and Random effect model meta-analyses were performed. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. R® software was used for the analysis. RESULTS: 893 articles were identified during the search. 8 observational studies (6 for DOACs and 2 for sulodexide) and 2 RCTs for sulodexide, out of the 11 studies included in the qualitative synthesis, were included for the prevention and treatment of PTS, respectively. Meta-analyses of observational studies showed an overall incidence of PTS of 15% (95% CI, 11-19) for sulodexide, and a 50% reduction of PTS signs and/or symptoms for rivaroxaban compared to warfarin (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.65). The overall estimate of the two sulodexide RCTs showed a significant improvement in complete ulcer healing, with an OR of 2.32 (95% CI, 1.49-3.63). CONCLUSIONS: In prevention of PTS, sulodexide and rivaroxaban showed a low incidence and reduced risk of PTS respectively, while in PTS treatment, sulodexide was significantly effective in the complete ulcers healing. These results confirm the need to move from the traditional single-pillar approach with elastic compression stockings to a more effective multi-pillar approach, tailoring the treatment to each individual patient.

Theoretical Study of the Function of the IP3 Receptor/BK Channel Complex in a Single Neuron / Estudio Teórico de la Función del Complejo Receptor-IP3/Canales BK en Neurona Única

ABSTRACT Large conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels carry out many functions in the central nervous system. These channels open in response to increased cytosolic calcium ([Ca2+]cyt) concentration. The influx of calcium ions to the cytosol can occur through voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) on the plasma membrane and/ or through IP3 receptors (IP3-Rs) and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The BK channel/IP3-R/RyR interaction has been widely reported in smooth muscle but scarcely investigated in relation to neurons. The aim of this study was to theoretically explore the function of the BK/IP3-R complex by means of a computational model of a neuron that replicates the interaction between the release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (through IP3-Rs) and the opening of the BK channels. The mathematical models are based on the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism and the Goldbeter model. These models were implemented on Visual Basic® and differential equations were solved numerically. Distinct conditions were contemplated for BK conductance and the efflux of endoplasmic Ca2+ to the cytosol. An abrupt rise in [Ca2+]cyt (≥ 5 μM) and short duration (spark) was found to activate BK channels and either pause or stop the action potential train.

RESUMEN Los canales de potasio activados por calcio de gran conductancia (canales BK) cumplen múltiples funciones en el sistema nervioso central. Estos canales se abren en respuesta al incremento de la concentración de calcio citosólico ([Ca2+]cyt). La entrada de Ca2+ puede ocurrir a través de canales de calcio dependientes de voltaje (VGCCs) localizados en la membrana plasmática y por eflujo de Ca2+ del retículo endoplásmico (ER) causado por 1,4,5-Trifosfato (IP3) o rianodina (RyR). La interacción BK/IP3/RyR ha sido ampliamente estudiada en músculo liso, pero escasamente en neuronas. El objetivo de este estudio fue explorar teóricamente la función del complejo BK/IP3-R mediante un modelo computacional de una neurona que replica la interacción entre la liberación de Ca2+ del retículo endoplásmico (a través de IP3-Rs) y la apertura de los canales BK. Los modelos matemáticos se basan en el formalismo de Hodgkin-Huxley y el modelo de Goldbeter. Estos modelos fueron implementados en Visual Basic® y las ecuaciones diferenciales fueron resueltas por métodos numéricos. Se contemplaron distintas condiciones para la conductancia del canal BK y la salida de Ca2+ endoplásmico al citosol. Los resultados muestran que un incremento abrupto de [Ca2+] cyt (≥ 5 μM) y de corta duración (spark) activa los canales BK y producen una pausa o detiene el tren de potenciales de acción.

Risk for post-thrombotic syndrome after lower-limb deep vein thrombosis: location of the thrombus or residual thrombi? / Risk razvitiia posttromboflebiticheskogo sindroma posle tromboza glubokikh ven nizhnikh konechnostei: lokalizatsiia tromba ili rezidual'nyi tromboz?

BACKGROUND: Many works aimed to determine factors that influence the onset of postthrombotic syndrome after an acute episode of deep venous thrombosis. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of the most proximal extent of thrombus (proximal and distal DVT) versus the residual thrombosis as identified by venous ultrasonography performed during follow-up. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected 1183 consecutive cohort patients in the RIETE registry after a first episode of deep venous thrombosis and assessed for postthrombotic syndrome after 12 months. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that: residual thrombosis (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0,88-2,21), the presence of cancer (OR 1.38; 95% CI: 0,64-2,97), immobility (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0,70-2,43) and estrogen-containing drugs use (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0,63-6,83), all had a predictive value for the occurrence of PTS. CONCLUSION: Our study results revealed that ultrasound finding of residual thrombosis is more predictive than proximal location of thrombus for postthrombotic syndrome after episode of deep venous thrombosis. Real life data from a large group of patients from the RIETE registry substantiates that.

Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure.

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.

Outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and patent foramen ovale: Findings from the RIETE registry.

INTRODUCTION: An increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) was reported but few data exist regarding prognostic outcomes of those patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using data in the RIETE registry, we compared the characteristics, therapeutic approaches and outcomes of patients with PE according to the presence or absence of PFO. RESULTS: From August 2016 to January 2020, 4148 patients with acute PE were enrolled. Of these, 2775 (67%) had no transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), 993 (24%) underwent TTE but had no reported results on PFO. Among the remaining 380 patients, 287 (74%) did not have PFO and 93 (26%) had PFO. Patients with PFO were more likely to have chronic heart failure, prior myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke than those without PFO. Patients with PFO had a higher rate of subsequent ischemic stroke than those without PFO (hazard ratio (HR): 9.28; 95% CI: 1.83-69.1), than those with TTE but no data on PFO (HR: 10.1; 95% CI: 2.56-42.4) or without TTE (HR: 9.78; 95% CI: 3.02-28.4). On multivariable analysis, patients with PFO were at increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke than those without PFO (HR: 8.96; 95% CI: 1.68-47.7). CONCLUSIONS: PFO was searched in a minority of patients with an acute PE in real life setting. Subject to possible selection and measurement biases, our results confirmed a higher risk of ischemic stroke in PE patients with PFO compared to those without PFO. This association warrants further investigation before determining the best therapeutic option in patients with acute PE and concomitant PFO.

Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure. / Sumario de las recomendaciones y puntos clave del Consenso de las Sociedades Científicas Españolas (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENeo, SEDAR, SENP) para la utilización de la ventilación no invasiva y terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales en el paciente adulto, pediátrico y neonatal con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda grave.

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.

Recomendaciones de consenso respecto al soporte respiratorio no invasivo en el paciente adulto con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda secundaria a infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Clinical Consensus Recommendations Regarding Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in the Adult Patient with Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection

La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) es una infección del tracto respiratorio causada por un nuevo coronavirus emergente que se reconoció por primera vez en Wuhan, China, en diciembre de 2019. Actualmente la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha definido la infección como pandemia y existe una situación de emergencia sanitaria y social para el manejo de esta nueva infección. Mientras que la mayoría de las personas con COVID-19 desarrollan solo una enfermedad leve o no complicada, aproximadamente el 14% desarrollan una enfermedad grave que requiere hospitalización y oxígeno, y el 5% pueden requerir ingreso en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. En casos severos, COVID-19 puede complicarse por el síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda (SDRA), sepsis y shock séptico y fracaso multiorgánico. Este documento de consenso se ha preparado sobre directrices basadas en evidencia desarrolladas por un panel multidisciplinario de profesionales médicos de cuatro sociedades científicas españolas (Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias [SEMICYUC], Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica [SEPAR], Sociedad Española de Urgencias y Emergencias [SEMES], Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor [SEDAR]) con experiencia en el manejo clínico de pacientes con COVID-19 y otras infecciones virales, incluido el SARS, así como en sepsis y SDRA. El documento proporciona recomendaciones clínicas para el soporte respiratorio no invasivo (ventilación no invasiva, oxigenoterapia de alto flujo con cánula nasal) en cualquier paciente con presentación sospechada o confirmada de COVID-19 con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Esta guía de consenso debe servir como base para una atención optimizada y garantizar la mejor posibilidad de supervivencia, así como permitir una comparación fiable de las futuras intervenciones terapéuticas de investigación que formen parte de futuros estudios observacionales o de ensayos clínicos

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials

Recomendaciones de consenso respecto al soporte respiratorio no invasivo en el paciente adulto con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda secundaria a infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Clinical Consensus Recommendations Regarding Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in the Adult Patient with Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection

La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) es una infección del tracto respiratorio causada por un nuevo coronavirus emergente que se reconoció por primera vez en Wuhan, China, en diciembre de 2019. Actualmente la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha definido la infección como pandemia y existe una situación de emergencia sanitaria y social para el manejo de esta nueva infección. Mientras que la mayoría de las personas con COVID-19 desarrollan solo una enfermedad leve o no complicada, aproximadamente el 14% desarrollan una enfermedad grave que requiere hospitalización y oxígeno, y el 5% pueden requerir ingreso en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. En casos severos, COVID-19 puede complicarse por el síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda (SDRA), sepsis y shock séptico y fracaso multiorgánico. Este documento de consenso se ha preparado sobre directrices basadas en evidencia desarrolladas por un panel multidisciplinario de profesionales médicos de cuatro sociedades científicas españolas (Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias [SEMICYUC], Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica [SEPAR], Sociedad Española de Urgencias y Emergencias [SEMES], Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor [SEDAR]) con experiencia en el manejo clínico de pacientes con COVID-19 y otras infecciones virales, incluido el SARS, así como en sepsis y SDRA. El documento proporciona recomendaciones clínicas para el soporte respiratorio no invasivo (ventilación no invasiva, oxigenoterapia de alto flujo con cánula nasal) en cualquier paciente con presentación sospechada o confirmada de COVID-19 con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Esta guía de consenso debe servir como base para una atención optimizada y garantizar la mejor posibilidad de supervivencia, así como permitir una comparación fiable de las futuras intervenciones terapéuticas de investigación que formen parte de futuros estudios observacionales o de ensayos clínicos

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials

Clinical Consensus Recommendations Regarding Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in the Adult Patient with Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. / Recomendaciones de consenso respecto al soporte respiratorio no invasivo en el paciente adulto con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda secundaria a infección por SARS-CoV-2.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials.

D-dimer levels and risk of recurrence following provoked venous thromboembolism: findings from the RIETE registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) secondary to transient risk factors may develop VTE recurrences after discontinuing anticoagulation. Identifying at-risk patients could help to guide the duration of therapy. METHODS: We used the RIETE database to assess the prognostic value of d-dimer testing after discontinuing anticoagulation to identify patients at increased risk for recurrences. Transient risk factors were classified as major (postoperative) or minor (pregnancy, oestrogen use, immobilization or recent travel). RESULTS: In December 2018, 1655 VTE patients with transient risk factors (major 460, minor 1195) underwent d-dimer measurements after discontinuing anticoagulation. Amongst patients with major risk factors, the recurrence rate was 5.74 (95% CI: 3.19-9.57) events per 100 patient-years in those with raised d-dimer levels and 2.68 (95% CI: 1.45-4.56) in those with normal levels. Amongst patients with minor risk factors, the rates were 7.79 (95% CI: 5.71-10.4) and 3.34 (95% CI: 2.39-4.53), respectively. Patients with major risk factors and raised d-dimer levels (n = 171) had a nonsignificantly higher rate of recurrences (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.14; 95% CI: 0.96-4.79) than those with normal levels. Patients with minor risk factors and raised d-dimer levels (n = 382) had a higher rate of recurrences (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.51-3.63) than those with normal levels. On multivariate analysis, raised d-dimers (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.09-2.77) were associated with an increased risk for recurrences in patients with minor risk factors, not in those with major risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with raised d-dimer levels after discontinuing anticoagulant therapy for VTE provoked by a minor transient risk factor were at an increased risk for recurrences.

Deep Vein Thrombosis in Europe-Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major health-care burden in Europe, but exact estimates are lacking. This study reports results from the PREFER venous thromboembolism (VTE) study concerning health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and mortality of patients with DVT. METHODS: PREFER VTE was a prospective, observational study, conducted in 7 European countries, designed to provide data concerning treatment patterns, resource utilization, mortality, and QoL. First-time or recurrent patients with DVT were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Health-related QoL-as measured by the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument ( EQ-5D-5L)-was analyzed using Tobit regression with repeated measures, assessing the impact of baseline characteristics stratified by cancer activity. Mortality was analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with DVT had a 0.14 lower EQ-5D-5L index score (0.72 for total sample) compared to the reference UK population (0.85). The EQ-5D-5L index score improved from baseline to 12 months in patients with active cancer (from 0.70 to 0.79) and those without (0.72-0.87); 7.3% died within a year, a 5.2% excess mortality compared to the age- and gender-adfjusted general population. The 12-month mortality rate of DVT varied between 2.9% in the pooled data from Germany, Switzerland, or Austria and 15.4% in Italy. Furthermore, the mortality rate differed between patients with active cancer and those without (42.9% vs 4.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Deep vein thrombosis is associated with a substantial burden of illness in terms of HrQoL at baseline, which following treatment normalizes after 12 months and has a significant mortality rate. In addition, active cancer has a significant impact on mortality and the HrQoL of patients with DVT.

Anticoagulantes orales directos en la fibrilación auricular no valvular: cómo mejorar su uso en España / Novel oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: How to improve its management in Spain

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Recientes estudios con datos en vida real sobre el uso de anticoagulantes de acción directa (ACOD) en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular, aportan datos del empleo de los diferentes ACOD según las características de los pacientes. El objetivo de este trabajo fue elaborar un documento sobre las sugerencias de uso de los ACOD en función de la evidencia existente en la literatura y de la experiencia clínica. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Un panel multidisciplinar de 8 expertos consensuó y desarrolló el contenido. El documento elaborado fue completado en 10 reuniones regionales con expertos de distintas especialidades. El panel valoró las aportaciones de los expertos regionales y elaboró las sugerencias definitivas. RESULTADOS: El documento final recoge las aportaciones generadas a lo largo de todo el proceso en 3 apartados. Se detallan las conclusiones/sugerencias generales sobre el empleo de los ACOD. Se proponen sugerencias concretas de empleo de cada ACOD en función de características clínicas específicas de los pacientes. Por último, se definen las limitaciones al empleo de los ACOD y se proponen acciones para mejorar el manejo de la anticoagulación. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario superar las barreras clínicas y administrativas que dificultan el óptimo empleo de los ACOD con el fin de mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular que precisan anticoagulación

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent real-world data studies on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, provide data on the use of different DOAC according to patient characteristics. The objective of this work was to elaborate on the suggestions on the use of DOAC based on evidence and clinical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of 8 experts developed the agreed content. The document was completed in 10 regional meetings with experts from different specialties. According to these contributions, the panel prepared the final suggestions. RESULTS: The final document includes the contributions generated throughout the entire process in 3 sections. The general conclusions / suggestions on the use of DOAC are detailed. Specific tips on the use of each DOAC are proposed, based on the specific clinical profiles of the patients. Finally, the limitations on the use of DOAC are defined, and a group of actions are proposed to improve the management of anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to overcome the clinical and administrative barriers that hinder the optimal use of DOAC, in order to improve the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation

Resumption of anticoagulant therapy after anticoagulant-related gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is permanently discontinued in up to 50% of patients following a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. A previous meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of thromboembolism and death, and a non-statistically significant increased risk of re-bleeding associated with resumption. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to determine the risks of recurrent GI bleeding, thromboembolism, and death in patients who resumed OAC compared to those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for new references from January 2014 to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving adults with OAC-related GI bleeding were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROBINS-I tool. Pooled relative risk (RR) ratios were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 12 observational studies involving 3098 patients. There was an increased risk of recurrent GI bleeding (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.47-2.48, I2 = 0%, 11 studies), and a reduced risk of thromboembolism (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68, I2 = 59.8%, 9 studies) and death (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.70, I2 = 71.8%, 8 studies) in patients who resumed OAC compared to those who did not. Eleven studies were judged to be at serious risk of bias due to confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Resuming OAC after OAC-related GI bleeding appears to be associated with an increase in recurrent GI bleeding, but a reduction in thromboembolism and death. Further prospective data are needed to identify patients for whom the net clinical benefit favours OAC resumption and the optimal timing of resumption.

[Novel oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: How to improve its management in Spain]. / Anticoagulantes orales directos en la fibrilación auricular no valvular: cómo mejorar su uso en España.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent real-world data studies on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, provide data on the use of different DOAC according to patient characteristics. The objective of this work was to elaborate on the suggestions on the use of DOAC based on evidence and clinical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of 8 experts developed the agreed content. The document was completed in 10 regional meetings with experts from different specialties. According to these contributions, the panel prepared the final suggestions. RESULTS: The final document includes the contributions generated throughout the entire process in 3 sections. The general conclusions / suggestions on the use of DOAC are detailed. Specific tips on the use of each DOAC are proposed, based on the specific clinical profiles of the patients. Finally, the limitations on the use of DOAC are defined, and a group of actions are proposed to improve the management of anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to overcome the clinical and administrative barriers that hinder the optimal use of DOAC, in order to improve the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation.

Pronóstico de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en cirugía ortopédica o pacientes traumatológicos y uso de tromboprofilaxis / Prognosis of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery or trauma patients and use of thromboprophylaxis

Antecedentes: Hay escasa evidencia sobre el pronóstico de la tromboembolia venosa en pacientes sometidos a cirugía ortopédica y en pacientes que sufren un trauma no quirúrgico. Métodos: Utilizamos la base de datos RIETE (Registro Informatizado de pacientes con Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) para comparar el pronóstico del tromboembolismo venoso y el uso de tromboprofilaxis en pacientes sometidos a diferentes procedimientos ortopédicos y en pacientes con traumatismo que no requiere cirugía. Resultados: Desde marzo de 2001 a marzo de 2015, se inscribieron un total de 61.789 pacientes en RIETE. De estos, 943 (1.52%) desarrollaron tromboembolismo venoso después de artroplastia electiva, 445 (0.72%) después de fractura de cadera, 1.045 (1.69%) después de cirugía ortopédica no mayor y 2,136 (3.46%) después de trauma no quirúrgico. En general, 2.283 pacientes (50%) presentaron inicialmente embolia pulmonar. En los primeros 90 días de tratamiento, 30 pacientes (0.66%, IC 95% 0.45-0.93) murieron por embolia pulmonar. La tasa de embolia pulmonar fatal fue significativamente mayor después de cirugía de fractura de cadera (n = 9 [2.02%]) que después de la artroplastia electiva (n = 5 [0.53%]), cirugía ortopédica no mayor (n = 5 [0.48%]) o traumatismo no quirúrgico (n = 11 [0,48%]). La tromboprofilaxis se utilizó con mayor frecuencia para la fractura de cadera (93%) o la artroplastia electiva (94%) que para la cirugía ortopédica no mayor (71%) o traumatismo no quirúrgico (32%). La hemorragia mayor fue significativamente mayor después de la cirugía de fractura de cadera (4%) que después de artroplastia electiva (1,6%), cirugía ortopédica no mayor (1,5%) o traumatismo no quirúrgico (1,4%). Conclusiones: La tromboprofilaxis se utilizó con menos frecuencia en los procedimientos de menor riesgo a pesar del número absoluto de embolia pulmonar fatal después de cirugía ortopédica no mayor o traumatismo no quirúrgico, excedieron los observados después de procedimientos de alto riesgo

Background: There is scarce evidence about the prognosis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery and in patients suffering non-surgical trauma. Methods: We used the RIETE database (Registro Informatizado de pacientes con Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) to compare the prognosis of venous thromboembolism and the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing different orthopedic procedures and in trauma patients not requiring surgery. Results: From March 2001 to March 2015, a total of 61,789 patients were enrolled in RIETE database. Of these, 943 (1.52%) developed venous thromboembolism after elective arthroplasty, 445 (0.72%) after hip fracture, 1,045 (1.69%) after non-major orthopedic surgery and 2,136 (3.46%) after non-surgical trauma. Overall, 2,283 patients (50%) initially presented with pulmonary embolism. Within the first 90 days of therapy, 30 patients (0.66%; 95% CI 0.45-0.93) died from pulmonary embolism. The rate of fatal pulmonary embolism was significantly higher after hip fracture surgery (n = 9 [2.02%]) than after elective arthroplasty (n = 5 [0.53%]), non-major orthopedic surgery (n = 5 [0.48%]) or non surgical trauma (n = 11 [0.48%]). Thromboprophylaxis was more commonly used for hip fracture (93%) or elective arthroplasty (94%) than for non-major orthopedic surgery (71%) or non-surgical trauma (32%). Major bleeding was significantly higher after hip fracture surgery (4%) than that observed after elective arthroplasty (1.6%), non-major orthopedic surgery (1.5%) or non-surgical trauma (1.4%). Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis was less frequently used in lower risk procedures despite the absolute number of fatal pulmonary embolism after non-major orthopedic surgery or non-surgical trauma, exceeded that observed after high risk procedures

Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Current guidelines for anticoagulant therapy do not so far suggest any form of differentiated approach to cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). This review article provides an overview of the published literature in cancer patients with VTE, mostly using data from the RIETE registry. Our findings provide some insights into what factors may be used to guide physicians in adapting recommended anticoagulant regimens to the individual patient, as oncologists are increasingly doing with cancer treatments. For instance, patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) alone might benefit from curtailing treatment intensity as anticoagulant therapy progresses. The site of cancer also needs to be considered. In patients with incidental PE or splanchnic vein thrombosis, we should be more cautious before prescribing anticoagulant therapy. The optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy is unknown.

Deep-vein thrombosis in Europe - Burden of illness in relationship to healthcare resource utilization and return to work.

OBJECTIVES: Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) forms a major healthcare burden in Europe, but exact estimates concerning the economic burden on society are lacking. This study reports results from the PREFER in VTE study concerning resource utilization and absence from work in DVT patients. METHODS: The PREFER in VTE registry was a prospective, observational, multicenter study carried out in Europe (France, Italy, Spain, the UK, and DACH [Germany, Switzerland and Austria]), designed to provide data concerning treatment patterns, resource utilization, mortality and quality of life. Patients with a first-time and/or recurrent DVT, were recruited and followed for 12 months. Data about resource utilization concerns resource utilization related to DVT. Specifically, treatment pattern, re-hospitalization rate, length of hospital stay, ambulatory/office visit, and proportion of patients returning to work, were analyzed and presented. Subgroup analysis by country and active cancer were also conducted. The length of hospital stay was analyzed as a function of demographics, previous events and co-morbidities using zero-inflated binomial negative regression. Similarly, time until return to work was analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 2056 patients with DVT were recruited, with an average age of 60 years. Patients with active cancer were mostly treated with heparin (83.9%), while patients without active cancer were treated with combinations of heparin, VKA and DOACs. DOACs were less often used in Spain and Italy (<7.0%). Following the management of their initial DVT 20.5% of the patients with and 12.2% of patients without active cancer (n = 88; n = 1462) were hospitalized for on average 8.2 and 10.1 days, respectively. The hospitalization-rate was highest in Italy (16.7%) and lowest in France (7.7%). Furthermore, the average length of stay was highest in Italy (16.6 days) and lowest in DACH (5.2 days). Physician visits were highest in DACH (9.3), lowest in the UK (2.6). Of those working, 50% returned to work at 1 month; >30% did not return to work within the year. CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment of DVT differed between patients with active cancer and those without. Post-VTE or VTE-related resource utilization differs remarkably between countries. Work-loss seems high, but questions may be raised concerning the causality due to the presence of co-morbidities.

Prognosis of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery or trauma patients and use of thromboprophylaxis. / Pronóstico de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en cirugía ortopédica o pacientes traumatológicos y uso de tromboprofilaxis.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce evidence about the prognosis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery and in patients suffering non-surgical trauma. METHODS: We used the RIETE database (Registro Informatizado de pacientes con Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) to compare the prognosis of venous thromboembolism and the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing different orthopedic procedures and in trauma patients not requiring surgery. RESULTS: From March 2001 to March 2015, a total of 61,789 patients were enrolled in RIETE database. Of these, 943 (1.52%) developed venous thromboembolism after elective arthroplasty, 445 (0.72%) after hip fracture, 1,045 (1.69%) after non-major orthopedic surgery and 2,136 (3.46%) after non-surgical trauma. Overall, 2,283 patients (50%) initially presented with pulmonary embolism. Within the first 90 days of therapy, 30 patients (0.66%; 95% CI 0.45-0.93) died from pulmonary embolism. The rate of fatal pulmonary embolism was significantly higher after hip fracture surgery (n = 9 [2.02%]) than after elective arthroplasty (n = 5 [0.53%]), non-major orthopedic surgery (n = 5 [0.48%]) or non surgical trauma (n = 11 [0.48%]). Thromboprophylaxis was more commonly used for hip fracture (93%) or elective arthroplasty (94%) than for non-major orthopedic surgery (71%) or non-surgical trauma (32%). Major bleeding was significantly higher after hip fracture surgery (4%) than that observed after elective arthroplasty (1.6%), non-major orthopedic surgery (1.5%) or non-surgical trauma (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis was less frequently used in lower risk procedures despite the absolute number of fatal pulmonary embolism after non-major orthopedic surgery or non-surgical trauma, exceeded that observed after high risk procedures.